BNPL gaps in vet and auto care signal fintech's next frontier

A 33-country audit finds installment payment options absent from the most financially urgent consumer service categories.

A modern self-service kiosk with an illuminated touchscreen displaying "Payroll" and "Financial-Wellness" stands in a bright, blurred office interior with a plant and chairs.

A new audit from UK lending infrastructure firm TIMVERO has identified a structural mismatch at the intersection of consumer finance and everyday services: the businesses where customers most urgently need flexible payment options are the least likely to offer them.

TIMVERO surveyed 600 consumer-facing businesses across 12 categories in 33 countries, examining whether each advertised an installment or buy now, pay later (BNPL) option at the point of sale. Overall, 71% of businesses in the sample offered some form of instalment payment. But the distribution was sharply uneven.

Where flexibility is missing most

Bicycle and e-mobility retailers led adoption at 96%, followed by furniture (94%), home renovation (88%), online education (84%) and optical care (84%). These are categories where consumers can plan a purchase and shop around. At the other end of the spectrum sat the categories where financial pressure is most acute and least predictable: auto repair and servicing (36%), driving schools (42%), veterinary clinics (46%) and elective medical clinics (48%). In each of these four, more than half of businesses surveyed offered no instalment option at all.

The pattern matters because unplanned, time-sensitive costs are precisely where consumers are most exposed. A car breakdown or a pet emergency does not allow for comparison shopping or budget scheduling. Dmitriy Wolkenstein, CEO and co-founder of TIMVERO, put it directly: "Where installments are still uncommon, businesses have an opportunity to meet that demand by offering their own interest-free payment plans. Veterinary care and auto repair are good examples."

Demand-side data reinforces the urgency. PYMNTS Intelligence recorded US Gen Z use of credit card instalment products rising from 31% to 47% in under a year. Separately, Morning Consult found that 66% of shoppers said they would abandon a cart without their preferred BNPL option, while a PYMNTS survey found 43% of consumers would not complete a purchase at all without one.

The convergence angle for cross-sector investors

The TIMVERO findings are narrow in scope but carry a broader signal for investors and strategists tracking the retail-fintech convergence. The BNPL market, once dominated by consumer-facing platforms such as Klarna, Afterpay and Clearpay, is increasingly fragmenting into embedded finance: lenders providing white-label instalment rails directly to merchants and service operators, who deploy the product under their own brand without routing customers to a third-party checkout flow. TIMVERO's own model, which provides lending infrastructure to banks, credit unions and licensed lenders across more than 13 countries, sits squarely in this embedded-finance layer.

The gap between high-adoption retail categories and low-adoption service categories represents a market-entry question for lenders and infrastructure providers. Veterinary chains, auto-repair networks and elective-health groups are fragmented industries with thin margins, uneven technology adoption and limited in-house credit expertise. They are not natural first movers on lending infrastructure. But they are also, increasingly, the front line of Gen Z's financial stress. Household formation rates among younger cohorts are falling across the OECD; discretionary income is being compressed by housing costs and student debt. The categories where BNPL penetration is lowest overlap closely with the categories that cannot easily be deferred.

For capital allocators watching embedded finance, the structural opportunity is clear. The first wave of BNPL growth ran through electronics and fashion retailers. The second wave is moving into higher-ticket, irregular-spend service verticals. Whether that opportunity is captured by incumbent infrastructure providers, by specialist fintech entrants, or by the service operators themselves building proprietary credit products will depend heavily on regulatory posture in each market, particularly in the EU and UK, where consumer credit rules are tightening around instalment lending disclosures and affordability checks. That regulatory variable is one the TIMVERO data does not address, but it is the one most likely to determine which players can move fastest into the underserved categories the audit has identified.